ASTSWMO

Final Performance Systems Survey, Developed by the Performance Systems Task Force

The Performance Systems Task Force of the Hazardous Waste Subcommittee of the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) has engaged in activities to coordinate States’ efforts in identifying opportunities for facility specific flexibility under the RCRA program to be implemented by States that is designed to result in more protective, yet enforceable, environmental management and outcomes. As such, the Task Force has concluded that there exists to “one size fits all” performance system that would satisfy the goal of needed flexibility among the different State programs.

Final BRAC Guide

The ASTSWMO Base Closure Focus Group developed this Guide in October 2006 to identify changes to the BRAC process as outlined in DoD’s March 2006 Base Realignment and Redevelopment Manual and to assist State and Territories in working with DoD, local redevelopment authorities and communities in assuring protective, expeditious cleanup and property transfer. In January 2009, the ASTSWMO Base Closure and Radiation Focus Groups updated the Guide to include Chapter VII, Radiological Constituents.  In April 2010, the Remediation and Reuse Focus Group updated the Guide to include Appendix A, Early Property Transfer at NPL Sites.

Product Stewardship Framework Policy Document

The following product stewardship policy document outlines many of the components and issues that States are grappling with as they consider how to effectively implement product stewardship for a wide variety of products and materials. The document is meant to serve as guidance in the development of State policy that addresses the environmental impact of products particularly as States transition from a focus on individual products to a more comprehensive and consistent framework approach.

State Fund Survey Results 2009 and Prior

(Please note that these PDFs are meant to be printed on legal size paper)

State Fund Survey Results 2009

Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

State Fund Survey Results 2008 (June 2008)

The complete survey results in a single PDF file (190.7 KB)

Summary
Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds>

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2007 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2007)

2007 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2006 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2006)

2006 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2005 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2005)

2005 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2004 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2004)

2004 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2003 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2003)

2003 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2002 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2002)

2002 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2001 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2001)

2001 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

2000 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 2000)

2000 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

1999 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1999)

1999 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

1998 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1998)

1998 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

1997 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1997)

1997 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

1996 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1996)

1996 Summary

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: State Fund Updates

1995 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1995)

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

1994 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1994)

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

1993 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1993)

Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 5: Summary of Additional Survey Information

1992 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey (June 1992)

Status Table
Table 1: Design Characteristics of State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 2: Funding for State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 3: Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds

Table 4: Cost Control Measures and Management Practices Used by State Financial Assurance Funds

ASTSWMO Comments on its partnership with the Department of Defense

It has come to the attention of the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) that questions have been raised about the nature of our association and the work our members do, particularly in relation to the federal government. The purpose of this letter is to clearly state what ASTSWMO is and does and to highlight the successful partnership ASTSWMO and the Department of Defense (DOD) have had over the last ten years.

ASTSWMO Comments on the Proposed Rule, Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste

The Board of Directors of the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (herein referred to as “ASTSWMO”) has reviewed the October 28, 2003 proposed rule (68 FR 61558) containing suggested revisions to the definition of solid waste. The ASTSWMO Board is comprised of 14 senior-level State waste program experts representing all geographic and regional areas of the country, and the comments contained herein reflect their collective technical opinions regarding major aspects of the rule proposal. The Board is submitting this letter stating its support of separate comments submitted to the Docket by ASTSWMO’s Hazardous Waste Recycling Task Force (“Task Force”) regarding three areas discussed in the proposal of significant importance to States: notification, legitimacy criteria, and exclusion of on-site recycling. Individual States will also submit comments reflecting their own unique perspectives on the proposed components of the rule.